Subjects Inside: Article
V Applications
FAQ,
Application Counts By
Congress, Articles,
AVC Legislative Report, CRS Reports,
Convention of State, Compact for America, COS, CFA--Which States are Which?, The Historic Record of COS, COS, CFA Laws, COS Articles, CRS Reports on COS/CFA, COS, CFA Financial Records, CFA Financials, COS Financials, COS/CFA Financial Conclusions, John
Birch Society, Con-Con, Runaway
Convention, Who Called the Convention, Congressional
Vote on a "Runaway" Convention, "Obey
the Constitution, Only Two More States", Illegal Rescissions, The Phony Burger Letter, The
Madison Letter, Fotheringham Exchange, JBS Articles, Sibley
Lawsuit, General Interest, Article V.org,
Robert Natelson, History
of Article V, Counting the Applications, The Numeric Count History, Congressional Decision of May 5, 1789,
Development of Article V, The Committee of the Whole, The Committee of Detail, August 30, September 10, Committee of Style, September 15, Official Government Documents,
History of FOAVC, Founders,
Audio/Visual,
Links,
Contact
Us, Legal
Page, 14th Amendment, The Electoral Process, Packets,
Definitions,
Numeric, (
Applications grouped by numeric count as required by the Constitution),
Same Subject (Applications grouped by amendment subject, not required by the Constitution for a convention call).
Page 16--FOAVC
Contact Page
Please
use the information below to inform FOAVC about events
regarding the Article V Convention movement, submit a proposed article,
send us an inquiry, or contact us regarding problems or errors on our site.
Unlike many other groups in the Article V Convention movement FOAVC
policy is to correct errors that may have inadvertently appeared on its
site. We therefore welcome feedback.
Note: FOAVC refers to the rules of
"English grammar" in discussing various aspects of Article V. While
FOAVC relies on the best knowledge available regarding the rules of
"English grammar" nevertheless errors of grammar occur. We request
anyone finding errors of English grammar on this site please
bring it to the attention of FOAVC so it may be addressed. This site
does not purport to be an "expert" on all rules of English grammar. We
merely wish to point out anyone studying the Constitution must accept
those who wrote that instrument were well versed in those rules and
they were not disregarded during the composition of the Constitution.
Thus a proper interpretation of the intent and meaning of the words,
phrases and so forth used in the Constitution requires, at the minimum,
a clear understanding of the rules of English language and their effect
and affect on the language of the Constitution.
Page Last Updated: 25-JUL-2020