Logo
Subjects Inside: Article V Applications  FAQ, Application Counts By Congress, Articles, AVC Legislative Report, CRS Reports, Convention of State, Compact for America, COS, CFA--Which States are Which?, The Historic Record of COS, COS, CFA Laws, COS Articles, CRS Reports on COS/CFA, COS, CFA Financial Records, CFA Financials, COS Financials, COS/CFA Financial Conclusions, John Birch Society, Con-Con, Runaway Convention, Who Called the Convention, Congressional Vote on a "Runaway" Convention, "Obey the Constitution, Only Two More States", Illegal Rescissions, The Phony Burger Letter, The Madison Letter, Fotheringham Exchange, JBS Articles, Sibley Lawsuit, General Interest, Article V.org, Robert Natelson, History of Article V, Counting the Applications, The Numeric Count History, Congressional Decision of May 5, 1789, Development of Article V, The Committee of the Whole, The Committee of Detail, August 30, September 10, Committee of Style, September 15, Official  Government Documents, History of FOAVC, Founders, Audio/Visual, Links, Contact Us, Legal Page, 14th Amendment, The Electoral Process, Packets, Definitions, Numeric, (Applications grouped by numeric count as required by the Constitution),  Same Subject (Applications grouped by amendment subject, not required by the Constitution for a convention call).



COS Convention Proposals Face Ratification

Unencumbered by the requirements for electoral selection or participation by the people the Convention of States Project held a convention for proposing amendments in Williamsburg, Virginia September 21-23, 2016 billed as a "simulated" convention but in fact, was a "real" convention. Official state representatives from all 50 states overwhelmingly approved six amendment proposals far in excess of the required two thirds approval vote mandated by the Constitution.

However due to a legal oversight, the convention neglected to transmit their amendment proposals to Congress to begin the ratification process
required by Article V. Bill Walker, co-founder of FOAVC corrected this error and sent a letter to the Clerk of the House of Representatives requesting the proposed amendments be assigned modes of ratification. The Constitution does not permit Congress to refuse a mode of ratification for a proposed amendment coming from a convention. According to information received the letter is on the desk of Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, who is on record as opposing an Article V Convention (See: Page 7). The letter may be viewed by clicking on the images below or can be viewed in pdf format here.

Walker stated, "The Convention of States Project caused state laws for a "Convention of States" to be enacted in three states. These laws have effect all 50 states under full faith and credit. The convention was attended by official state officeholders identified at the convention in their official capacity thus officially representing their states. The laws excludes election of delegates by the people. The law makes no allowance for a "simulated" convention. In all respects therefore the convention was not "simulated" as asserted by COS but in fact an official convention held in full compliance with the laws of this nation regarding an Article V Convention."

Walker stated there was no difference between how the "simulated" convention operated and the "real" convention called for in the state laws. The state laws, he said, do not permit a "simulated" convention where current official officeholders are present representing the states in their official capacities. As to submitting the applications, Walker noted none of the state laws provide for this necessary step meaning any proposal made by a COS Convention, "real" or not can never be ratified under current state law. "I merely helped them along," he said. He noted under the terms of Article V in order to get the six proposed amendments ratified will require 228 favorable votes in the various states.

Whether the proposed amendments will even be presented to the states for ratification is doubtful. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan is on public record as opposing any convention and recently won an appeal in the District Court of Appeals denying a request Congress call a convention. It is likely any this convention's proposed amendments will be ignored by Congress in violation of the Constitution. Speaker Ryan's office has thus far refused to make a public statement on the matter.

Mr. Walker's letter letter to Congress can be read below. Click on images to enlarge. Walker letter PDF file


001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
011
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
033
034
035
036
037
038
039
040
041
042
043
044
045
046
047
048
049
050

051
052
053
054
055
056
057

Page Last Updated: 9 APRIL 2017